[ad_1]
Whereas the lender operated a number of mortgage workplaces in Birmingham, they had been all in majority-white areas, and fewer than 3% of its junk mail promoting was despatched to majority-Black neighborhoods between 2018 and 2020. In consequence, Fairway’s mortgage utility charge in Black neighborhoods was simply 3.7% throughout this era, whereas its peer lenders served these areas at greater than 3 times that charge.
“The CFPB and DOJ are holding Fairway accountable for redlining Black neighborhoods,” stated CFPB director Rohit Chopra. “Fairway’s illegal redlining discouraged households from in search of loans for houses in Birmingham’s Black neighborhoods.”
Learn extra: Tips on how to root out discrimination within the mortgage business
Regardless of agreeing to the settlement, Fairway firmly denied that it engaged in discriminatory lending practices. In a press release, the corporate expressed frustration with how the federal government’s evaluation was primarily based on quotas moderately than proof of precise discrimination.
“The grievance considerably mischaracterizes the matter at challenge and seems to be deliberately inflammatory in nature. For one, the grievance characterizes Fairway’s actions as willful and reckless, a declare that was mutually rejected by the events previous to settlement,” the assertion learn. “As well as, the grievance characterizes Fairway’s actions as willful and intentional, regardless of the federal government companies’ failure to determine any proof to assist such a declare. Fairway is disenchanted by these statements within the grievance, which recommend dangerous religion by the a part of the federal government companies.”
[ad_2]
Source link
