Amazon Puts $1.4 Billion More Into Its Housing Fund, But Critics Call It a PR Play

In This Article

Key Takeaways

Amazon now has over $3 billion in its Housing Fairness Fund, which is concentrated on delivering inexpensive housing within the Puget Sound, Nationwide Capital, and Nashville areas.A part of Amazon’s mission is to protect inexpensive housing, which its largely been in a position to in its goal areas. Nonetheless, critics recommend Amazon’s funding is solely a PR play and a strategy to scale back tax burdens by means of actual property.

On June 11, Amazon introduced that it could be contributing one other $1.4 billion to its Housing Fairness Fund. Amazon created the fund again in 2021, initially giving $2.2 billion “with a dedication to create or protect 20,000 inexpensive houses within the Puget Sound, Nationwide Capital, and Nashville areas—three communities that Amazon calls house,” in line with a report by the corporate.

The three areas are all locations the place Amazon has main company hubs. The brand new pledge may have a considerable deal with Arlington, Virginia, the place Amazon has its HQ2. Amazon says it exceeded its goal and delivered 21,000 inexpensive houses as an alternative of the promised 20,000. The brand new funds will ship an extra 14,000 inexpensive houses for low-to-middle-income individuals within the goal areas, in line with the web big. 

Unsurprisingly, Amazon’s involvement in inexpensive housing has attracted as a lot criticism as reward. Critics say that whereas Amazon’s efforts are higher than nothing, they don’t negate the actual fact that the retailer is problematic for the communities it purports to serve. 

As is often the case with companies’ philanthropic ventures, the reality lies someplace within the center. Amazon can’t clear up all of the systemic issues affecting U.S. housing markets. However is it a part of the issue? And will it fine-tune its technique to ship extra impactful change? 

Let’s take a extra in-depth take a look at what Amazon has completed in inexpensive housing to date—and the place it might enhance.   

What Has Amazon’s Housing Fund Achieved So Far?

First, the great. As talked about, Amazon has delivered 21,000 inexpensive houses in its goal areas since establishing the Housing Fund in 2021. 

One of many true achievements of Amazon’s method is that it didn’t simply construct new items. In keeping with its Housing Fairness Fund Influence Report, 59% of Amazon’s funding to date has supported the preservation of current inexpensive housing, in addition to “the conversion of current prevailing-rate housing to devoted inexpensive houses.” This helps renters “prone to displacement from rising rents.” 

Amazon is heading in the right direction right here. The principle criticism leveraged in opposition to inexpensive housing by native teams and unbiased researchers is that it’s truly not very inexpensive. In keeping with the City Institute, “there’s a big hole between what these buildings price to assemble and keep and the rents most individuals pays.” From a developer’s perspective, inexpensive housing usually merely is not value it, so usually, inexpensive housing tasks find yourself needing authorities subsidies to make them viable. 

Even then,“inexpensive” housing usually finally ends up being unaffordable for an space’s lowest-income residents as a result of the metric used to find out what counts as inexpensive is in itself problematic. The U.S. Division of Housing and City Improvement (HUD) defines a house as inexpensive if a family spends not more than 30% of its earnings on housing-related prices. 

Clearly, that is a considerably arbitrary determine, particularly in areas the place native earnings can differ drastically, from, say, $40,000 to over $100,000 a 12 months. Definitions of “low earnings” additionally current quite a lot of variation as a result of low earnings could be something below 80% of the Space Median Earnings (AMI). Inexpensive housing usually finally ends up benefiting individuals on the larger finish of that spectrum. 

All this means changing current housing into inexpensive housing, or preserving what’s already been constructed, is extra sustainable for native communities. Amazon has gone one step additional in securing that affordability by guaranteeing that 95% of its inexpensive housing will keep inexpensive for 99 years. That’s uncommon: Most inexpensive houses are solely stored at inexpensive charges for 15 to 30 years, at which level they revert to market charges.

The opposite factor Amazon bought proper is that it has accurately recognized a power in its skill to make an instantaneous distinction to smaller-scale, native inexpensive housing tasks that want additional funding to succeed. 

A much-covered living proof is Crystal Home Flats in Arlington, Virginia. The enduring residence constructing went on sale in 2020, presenting a uncommon alternative to transform current high-quality housing into inexpensive housing for the Washington Housing Conservancy (WHC). 

The difficulty was that the WHC didn’t have sufficient to purchase the property. Amazon stepped in with a $378 million mortgage, and the WHC was in a position to shut on the property inside two months. Crystal Home Flats shall be inexpensive to below-AMI residents by 2026. 

WHC director Kimberly Driggings lately reiterated her help of Amazon’s housing efforts to Bloomberg: “We truly want the company sector to dial in….We depend on the federal government so clear up housing affordability, and we’re by no means going to unravel it solely that one space.”

The very fact is that Amazon’s technique of leaping in quick works. Piecing collectively funding for inexpensive housing tasks can take many months—typically years. Some types of funding have quite a lot of restrictions. Native housing advocacy teams merely would miss out on these tasks with out Amazon’s assist.

Lastly, Amazon’s housing efforts to date bought one other factor proper: The corporate employed native workers who know the housing markets they’re working in and, particularly in its Washington state department, “eschewed utilizing a fund managed by an outdoor entity; as an alternative, its leaders made offers straight with native builders,” in line with an article in the Guardian.

The Limitations and Controversies

Right here is the place issues get a bit extra controversial. Whereas Amazon has made a substantial effort to change into a part of the native housing panorama, critics are arguing that it’s completed this partly as a harm management technique.

You may also like

There is a crucial proven fact that constructive assessments of Amazon’s inexpensive housing enterprise don’t level out. Amazon solely bought concerned in inexpensive housing following complaints from native residents that its hubs had been bringing in too many company staff, who had been driving up native housing costs and exacerbating gentrification. 

The “Amazon impact” is actual. In keeping with Realtor.com, house costs in Arlington, Virginia, spiked 17% between Amazon’s announcement of its HQ2 in 2018 and the primary quarter of 2020. The rise within the nationwide median at the moment was 5.5%.

The opposite lesser-known reality about Amazon’s involvement in its three essential areas is that they’ve by no means been purely altruistic. The company big receives substantial quantities in tax breaks and incentives from these areas. In keeping with Good Jobs First, Amazon bought virtually $1 billion from Virginia, about $609 million from Washington, and $166 million from Tennessee. The $2 billion it dedicated to its Housing Fund positively begins to look a bit much less significant when offset by these figures. 

In truth, among the firm’s harsher critics say that the Housing Fund is little greater than good PR for a company that has the sources to do so much extra if it actually wished to. As Pat Garofalo has identified: “Optimistic press is one thing elected officers can level to the following time an organization comes asking for tax breaks or different favors. Something portraying the corporations as companions in the neighborhood which can be giving one thing again somewhat than purely extractive entities greases the skids for the following spherical of handouts.”

So, it’s a case of publicity and legitimization in favor of a real long-term imaginative and prescient. Let’s additionally not neglect that the bulk of Amazon’s funding comes within the type of loans, not grants, which implies it will get substantial returns on its involvement in inexpensive housing.

Lastly, the query of simply how inexpensive is “inexpensive” housing hasn’t actually been resolved. Critics proceed to level out that, regardless of Amazon’s dedication to the lacking middle—workers who don’t qualify for presidency subsidies, however earn between 30% and 80% of their AMI—individuals on the decrease finish of that spectrum are sometimes unnoticed.

For instance, an affect evaluation report from Stand Up Nashville concluded that “if Amazon’s previous practices round affordability proceed in Nashville, practically 90% of items would solely be inexpensive to four-person households that earn between $42,150 and $67,450. Many staff in Amazon’s warehouses would themselves not have the opportunity to afford these houses.”

The Backside Line

So, right here it is: the great, the unhealthy, and the considerably ugly in Amazon’s inexpensive housing actions so far. 

Will the $1.4 billion additional clear up the housing affordability disaster within the firm’s goal areas? Not even remotely. As Daniel Herriges insightfully identified, though Amazon’s investments look like “gargantuan sums of cash…if you truly begin doing the maths, probably the most shocking factor is how far they don’t go.” 

To offer an concept, the complete worth of all housing in Seattle in 2019 was $776 billion. That does give one pause for thought. 

The basic situation that Amazon can’t repair will not be inexpensive housing however housing affordability. The U.S. is within the midst of a housing affordability disaster, and it can’t be solved on any significant scale by injecting a little bit of funding into a number of housing tasks, useful as these are. “We have to cease costs from rising out of proportion to individuals’s skill to pay,” Herriges says. This may partly be achieved by restoring housing provide throughout the nation to sustainable ranges. However then, Amazon by no means stated that it might or would do this.

Discover the Proper Agent, Shut the Finest Deal

Step #1: Use Agent Finder to match with high investor-friendly actual property brokers that will help you discover, analyze, and shut your subsequent deal.

Observe By BiggerPockets: These are opinions written by the creator and don’t essentially signify the opinions of BiggerPockets.